Courses offered by external or local bodies to a wide range of people at the local and management level before and during the talks, as well as after an agreement: ☐ negotiation and peacebuilding☐ Solidarity and advocacy actions☐ Ensure coherent coordination of international assistance at the national and regional levels and for local aid☐ management Nation building and development of an autonomous industry, Agriculture, water management, etc. ☐ Communication, dissemination of information and support to internal cooperative☐ networks Vocational training and professional development (10) Rehabilitation and reintegration of ex-combatants into developing infrastructure (10 ☐) ☐ Development of forums with local leaders, peace groups within warring parties, interaction between members of opposing parties An important lesson of this review is that successful peace agreements are based On Leaders are anchored in the respect of their obligations. This was the case in the peace processes in South Africa, Namibia and Mozambique. However, such dedicated leadership cannot be assumed. In Lesotho, Burundi and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, political leaders have methodically dismantled key elements of the agreements that they saw as obstacles to their quest for power. Regional and international partners, on the other hand, have failed to enforce the provisions of peace processes when they have been violated. This underlines the indispensable role played by external guarantors in the years following the signing of an agreement. This is more than a superficial responsibility. Figure 2. Descriptive rates of the specific factors of failure of the peace process in the Central African Republic. 1. There was an imperfect mediation concept and process because no formula was developed that included a definition of the problem and interests of the parties to the dispute under a common concept of justice.2.

No exchange of proposals, concessions and agreements containing such a formula.3. Calls for a ceasefire, the demilitarization of the capital, and free and fair elections are unrealistic because there was no basis for an agreement.4. No understanding by conveying the deep-rooted sources of the conflict – group identity, security, recognition, autonomy, dignity and fear of group extinction on the one hand and refusal to re-submit to the rule on the other.5. Inability to find a relevant solution to the nature of the conflict in the region (ethnic community) and instead impose solutions such as a Eurocentric constitution and an electoral race in the pursuit of national unity. “. Imaginative peace strategies that guarantee life, physical integrity, property and identity must be formulated. Unity does not have to be absolute; Nor should sovereignty be sacred. Feasible peace strategies may include administrative decentralization, autonomy, federalism and separation. 6. The ineffectiveness of peacekeeping violated peacekeeping norms and requirements, leading to institutional frustration and regional disillusionment.

7. Peacekeeping mandates, including disarmament, the organization of an army and the guarantee of security, were too broad, ambitious and unrealistic in a country where ceasefires had never taken place and where the functional interaction of the country had never been achieved.8 Peacekeeping operations are plagued by vague and flexible job descriptions and work procedures, including the role and functions of the peacekeeping force, and a lack of understanding of the neutrality of the peacekeeping force. 9. The peacekeeping mandate was not specific and unrealistic, and not all parties to the conflict agreed with it and cooperated with it. The peacekeeping force had limited military capabilities and, in accordance with the principle of non-use of force, threatened the security of the mission.10 The lack of cooperation within the body that authorizes the peacekeeping mission (regional union), ideological differences, different motivations for participation and impartiality have undermined the “unity of purpose, impartiality, credibility and, ultimately, capacity” of the mission. 11. The measures exceeded the financial capacity of the Regional Union. Members had to support their own troops, and uncertain funding affected the efficiency and effectiveness of the mission.12 The Regional Union`s peacemaking and peacekeeping efforts should have been complemented by peace services that did not exist (expenditure on resources and expertise to effectively assist with humanitarian aid, reconstruction, monitoring, sustainable development and other indispensable interventions; the N`Djamena Agreements of 2013 and the Rome Agreements of 2017. 53.8% of the agreements had an initiative of the GDR. We found that the Bangui Agreements of 1997 followed the GDR process. In addition, there have been some initiatives by the GDR under the 2014 Brazzaville Accords, the 2015 Bangui Forum (the 2014 Brazzaville Accords), the 2017 Rome Agreement and the 2019 Bangui Agreement.

These were only the Bangui agreements of 2015 and 2019. Given these challenges, the risk of the peace process collapsing or stagnating indefinitely is significant. In both cases, U.S. pressure to withdraw U.S. forces from Afghanistan is likely to intensify. Some Republicans and Democrats are already in favor of a complete withdrawal of U.S. forces, regardless of the outcome of the negotiations. But that would be a mistake, especially if the Taliban are largely to blame. The United States still has interests in Afghanistan, such as preventing the country from becoming a safe haven for international terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda and the self-proclaimed Islamic State; avoid regional instability as Russia, Iran, Pakistan and India vie for influence in Afghanistan; and minimize the likelihood of a major humanitarian crisis. The fall of the Afghan government by the Taliban would probably also be a boon for Islamist extremists. After all, a hasty U.S. withdrawal without a peace deal would likely raise serious questions about U.S.

reliability over its allies. Based on these criteria, the main criticisms were directed at the United Nations commitment to deploy peacekeepers in the case studies (Hayner, 2007). Des Forges argues that when pro-Hutu forces like the CDR observed that they could continue the killings without a Un response, it encouraged more massacres (Burkhalter, 1994, citing Des Forges). Moreover, the reluctance of the United Nations to extend the mandate of UNAMIR shows how a lack of adequate commitment can affect the peace process (MacQueen, 2002). Similarly, in Sierra Leone, the low deployment of UAMSIL peacekeepers led to the same conclusion (Hayner, 2007). Given that after the arrival of thousands of British troops in Sierra Leone in 2001 and the stabilization of peace, the role of mediators in meeting law enforcement needs may be the turning point in peace processes (Gberie, 2005; Hayner, 2007). “A crucial advantage of a mediator is reputation, which is based on the perception of impartiality, or at least trust, leverage, respect and moral credibility. In addition to these ideal resources for third-party intervention, the search for a peaceful solution to a conflict through a regional organization must be characterized by substantial (systemic) principles that would govern various conflict situations. For the current flood of internal conflicts, these principles may include self-determination, basic human needs for identity and recognition, popular choice and decision-making through open and fair referendums and elections, popular participation in governance, and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. The development of such universal principles in the African regional system is still in its infancy. It is not always clear why some peace agreements succeed and others fail. However, this essay attempts to examine the main obstacles to successful implementation.

With a brief report on the peace process in Rwanda and Sierra Leone in the 1990s, the document attempts to examine the main obstacles to a peaceful solution. Therefore, the paper suggests arguing that the ability of an external mediator to address the problematic nature of troublemakers is crucial to mutual agreement. Since peace could not be maintained without the presence of a committed mediator, the prospects for lasting peace rested on the ability and willingness of the mediators to skillfully approach the negotiating talks. .


Mande- nos uma mensagem no WhatsApp